A Comparative Analysis of the Curriculum Systems of Indonesia and Singapore Based on the PRISMA Protocol

Abstract

This study aims to map the comparison of curriculum systems between Indonesia and Singapore using a descriptive qualitative approach through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA protocol. Data were gathered from the Publish or Perish database for the 2012-2024 period; from 312 initial documents, 24 selected studies were analyzed bibliometrically and through content analysis across seven primary dimensions. The results reveal fundamental differences: Indonesia's curriculum is deeply rooted in Pancasila values focusing on national character, while Singapore adopts a pragmatic-technocratic approach oriented toward individual potential and global efficiency. Significant differences were found in curriculum content; Indonesia implements a broad multidisciplinary scope, whereas Singapore emphasizes the mastery method in core subjects. Systemic challenges include geographic infrastructure gaps in Indonesia and student mental health pressures in Singapore. In conclusion, strengthening curriculum literacy for educators in Indonesia and integrating emotional well-being in Singapore are crucial. Future research should explore specific educator roles and the education-employment link to fill limited global research gaps