Manajemen Persepsi dan Otoritas Simbolik: Analisa Kritis Gaya Komunikasi Politik Elite Era Pemerintahan Prabowo-Gibran

Authors

  • Nur Azizah Universitas Bung Karno Author
  • Launa Universitas Sahid Jakarta Author
  • Bambang Mudjiyanto Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Author
  • Hayu Lusianawati Universitas Sahid Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70294/

Keywords:

Manajemen Persepsi, Otoritas Simbolik, Komunikasi Politik Elite, Akuntabilitas Diskursif, Legitimasi Politik

Abstract

Studi ini coba melihat secara kritis pola komunikasi politik elite era Prabowo–Gibran. Fokus kajian pada interaksi antara manajemen persepsi dan konstruksi otoritas simbolik. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif kritis-interpretif dan studi kasus, studi ini menganalisis data primer dan sekunder melalui teori framing, otoritas simbolik, dan teori etika diskursif. Temuan kajian menunjukkan bahwa strategi komunikasi terpusat dan repetitif berhasil mengonsolidasi legitimasi melalui produksi makna dan instrumentalisasi simbo kebangsaan. Namun, intensifikasi narasi potensial mengaburkan transparansi, mempersempit ruang deliberasi, dan menggeser legitimasi berbasis rasional-kritis ke konsensus terkelola. Kajian merekomendasi penguatan protokol etika komunikasi pemerintahan, transparansi data kebijakan secara proaktif, serta revitalisasi ruang publik deliberatif guna menjaga akuntabilitas diskursif dan kualitas demokrasi di era politik pascakebenaran.

References

Al Fatih, I. Z. et al. (2024) Peran Algoritma Media Sosial dalam Penyebaran Propaganda Politik Digital Menjelang Pemilu. Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional, 7(1), 1-12. doi: 10.7454/jkskn.v7i1.10090.

asatunews.co.id (2026, April 28) “Prabowo Perkuat Tim Komunikasi Lewat Penunjukan Qodari dan Hasan Nasbi”. Accessed by https://www.asatunews.co.id/prabowo-perombakan-tim-komunikasi-presiden#google_vignette.

bbc.com (2025, 06 Januari) “Makan Bergizi Gratis Perdana Sasar 600 Ribu Orang, Jauh Dari Target Awal — Apakah Program ini Terlalu Tergesa-gesa?”. Accessed by https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cx2ywv21708o.

Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018) The Disinformation Order: Disruptive Communication and the Decline of Democratic Institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–39. doi: 10.1177/0267232118760317.

Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018) Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243-253. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqx017.

Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language And Symbolic Power. Accessed by https://monoskop.org/ images/4/43/Bourdieu_Pierre_Language_and_Symbolic_Power_1991.pdf.

Chouldry, N. (2012) Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. London: Polity Press.

Christians, C. G. et al. (2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Accessed by https://www.scribd.com/document/661252711/Normative-Theories-of-the-Media-Journalism-in-Demo.

Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Entman, R. M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Accessed by https://fbaum.unc.edu/teaching/articles/J-Communication-1993-Entman.pdf.

Habermas, J. (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Trans by Thomas Burger). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Harsin, J. (2024) “Post-truth Politics and Epistemic Populism: About (Dis-)Trusted Presentation and Communication of Facts, Not False Information” In: Saul Newman & Maximilian Conrad (eds.) Post-Truth Populism: A New Political Paradigm (European Political Sociology). Switzerland: Palgrave (pp. 25-64).

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.

Hermawan, V. (2025). Political Communication in the Digital Era: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Public Opinion in the 2024 Election. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), 4(5), 160–169.

jppn.com (2025, April 11) “Pidato Prabowo di Parlemen Turki”. Accessed by https://jakarta.jpnn.com/politik/1598/presiden-prabowo-ngaku-grogi-pidato-parlemen-turki-tersenyum.

ksp.go.id.(2026, April 03) “Presiden Prabowo Bangun Ruang Diskusi Nasional, Antisipasi Dampak Geopolitik Dunia”. Accessed by https://www.ksp.go.id/presiden-prabowo-bangun-ruang-diskusi-nasional-antisipasi-dampak-geopolitik-dunia.html.

Kumalasari, C. et al (2025) Ethics and Responsibility in Political Demagogy: A Conceptual Review and Practical Implications. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 4(4), 1413-1419. doi: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1520.

Lim, M. (2022). Alternative Imaginations: Confronting and Challenging the Persistent Centrism in Social Media-Society Research. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 4(1), 1-22. doi: 10.15575/jassr.v4i1.59.

Lippman, W. (1922) Public Opinion. Accessed by https://monoskop.org/images/b/bf/ Lippman_Walter_Public_Opinion.pdf

Lubke, S. (2025) “Political Communication”. In: Daniel Stockemer, Stephen Sawyer, & Audrey Gagnon (eds.) IPSA Companion to Political Science. Springer Nature Reference.

Miles, M. B., et al. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications Inc.

Mietzner, M. (2010). Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court. Journal of Asian Studies, 10(3), 397–424. doi: 10.1017/S1598240800003672.

Nurhayati, A. (2025) “Di Balik Rutinitas Pemilu: Integritas di Tengah Ketegangan Institusional, Demokrasi, dan Kepemimpinan” In: Aniek Nurhayati & Firmansyah (eds.) Integritas Demokrasi Lokal Catatan Pemilu Indonesia 2024. Sidoardjo: CV. Duta Sains Indonesia.

Putra, B. A. (2025) President Prabowo’s Political Communication on Environmental Issues in Constructing Climate Narrative. LONTAR: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(1), 429-437. doi: 10.30656/lontar.v13.i1.10322.

Rahayu, H. S. et al. (2025) Political Communication Strategy in Legislative Elections in Indonesia (Case Study on Indonesian Legislative Members of the Golongan Karya Party). Journal of Posthumanism, 5(5), 2963-2984. doi: 10.63332/joph.v5i5.1701.

Ramadhan, M. D., & Hendrik, D. (2025) Analysis of Political Reciprocity in the Coalition Strategy of Prabowo-Gibran in the 2024 General Election. JPI: Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 11(1), 1-16. doi: 10.20473/jpi.v11i1.66796.

Rohmah, S. R., & Meriwijaya (2025) Narasi dan Wacana Komunikasi Politik Prabowo–Gibran dalam Kontestasi Pemilu 2024. JURNAL DINAMIKA: Wacana Mahasiswa Berparadigma, 6(2), 183-202. doi: 10.18326/dinamika.v6i2.183-202.

Sihombing, F. T., & Ndona, Y. (2026) Framing Gemoy Paslon Prabowo-Gibran: Upaya Meningkatkan Ketertarikan Pemilih Pemula (Studi Kasus di Desa Kalang, Kecamatan Sidikalang, Kabupaten Dairi). INOVASI: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 193-207. doi: 10.55606/inovasi.v5i1.5369.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Swari, N. K. T. N. et al. (2025) Dampak Penggunaan Media Sosial dan Kampanye Digital Terhadap Perilaku Pemilih Pemula (Gen Z) Dalam Pilkada Bali. TRIWIKRAMA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 8(5), 61-70. doi: 10.9963/fqbqqa30.

Tapsell, R. (2021). Social Media and Elections in Southeast Asia: The Emergence of Subversive, Underground Campaigning. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 117-134. doi: 10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093.

tempo.co. (2025, March 19) “Tagar Indonesia Gelap Dapat 81 Persen Sentimen Negatif”. Accessed by https://www.tempo.co/politik/tagar-indonesia-gelap-dapat-81-persen-sentimen-negatif-1221552.

Trzcinski, K. (2023) Power-Sharing in Indonesia: Stability Through Hybridiy. In: Jelonek Adam (eds.) Power-Sharing in the Divided Asian Societies. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Verlage / V&R Unipress (pp. 13-43).

ugm.ac.id (2024, December 17) “Presidential Communication Office Expected to Hear and Accept Public Aspirations”. Accessed by https://ugm.ac.id/en/news/presidential-communication-office-expected-to-hear-and-accept-public-aspirations/

Vaara, E. et al. (2016) Narratives as Sources of Stability and Change in Organizations: Approaches and Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495–520. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1120963.

Waisbord, S. (2018) The Elective Affinity Between Post-Truth Communication and Populist Politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17-34. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928.

Warburton, E. & Aspinall, E. (2019) Explaining Indonesia's Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion (Contemporary Southeast Asia). A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs (ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute), 41(2), 255-285. doi: muse.jhu.edu/article/732138.

Yin, R. K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

Similar Articles

71-80 of 186

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.